21st Sep 2012
kidsarrrright:

sciencesoup:

Googols and Googols
In 1938, mathematician Edward Kasner asked his nine-year-old nephew for a name for a large number—and his nephew promptly replied: “Googol.” A googol is a number equal to 10^100, or if you wanted to write it out, it would be a 1 with 100 zeroes following it. Already, this number is larger than the number of elementary particles in the known universe, which only amount to approximately 10^80. As if this wasn’t enough, the term was then extended to an even bigger number: a googolplex, which is 10 to the power of a googol—i.e., 10^(10^100). To write this out, it would be a 1 followed by a googol number of zeroes. Here’s where it gets intensely cool: you cannot physically write this number out in its entirety, because there is not enough space in the universe. Even if you wrote in unreadable one-point font, it would take up about 3.5×10^96 metres, while observable universe is only estimated to be 8.80×10^26 meters. So, you’d still need more paper than you could stuff into the entire universe—and furthermore, if you wrote at an average rate of two digits per second, it would take you more time to write it out than the age of the universe so far. And yet, even a googolplex comes nowhere near infinity. Numbers are awesome.
Watch Carl Sagan explain

NUMBERS AND MATH ARE NOT AWESOME.

kidsarrrright:

sciencesoup:

Googols and Googols

In 1938, mathematician Edward Kasner asked his nine-year-old nephew for a name for a large number—and his nephew promptly replied: “Googol.” A googol is a number equal to 10^100, or if you wanted to write it out, it would be a 1 with 100 zeroes following it. Already, this number is larger than the number of elementary particles in the known universe, which only amount to approximately 10^80. As if this wasn’t enough, the term was then extended to an even bigger number: a googolplex, which is 10 to the power of a googol—i.e., 10^(10^100). To write this out, it would be a 1 followed by a googol number of zeroes. Here’s where it gets intensely cool: you cannot physically write this number out in its entirety, because there is not enough space in the universe. Even if you wrote in unreadable one-point font, it would take up about 3.5×10^96 metres, while observable universe is only estimated to be 8.80×10^26 meters. So, you’d still need more paper than you could stuff into the entire universe—and furthermore, if you wrote at an average rate of two digits per second, it would take you more time to write it out than the age of the universe so far. And yet, even a googolplex comes nowhere near infinity. Numbers are awesome.

Watch Carl Sagan explain

NUMBERS AND MATH ARE NOT AWESOME.

This post has 4,326 notes
  1. spatialtopiary reblogged this from the-maths-blog
  2. the-maths-blog reblogged this from crystal-maths
  3. crystal-maths reblogged this from versatilism
  4. picspaaam reblogged this from noseastanfresa
  5. cosmologicalastrophysicist reblogged this from niceonespaaace
  6. noseastanfresa reblogged this from sciencesoup
  7. sylph-universe reblogged this from sylphaeon
  8. skybabyblue568 reblogged this from themathkid
  9. experienced reblogged this from sciencenetlinks
  10. shy-is-me reblogged this from sciencenetlinks
  11. thebrigadeiroshop reblogged this from sciencenetlinks
  12. lagrange26 reblogged this from visualizingmath
  13. owlthedragon reblogged this from zoerussle
  14. zoerussle reblogged this from itsxandy
  15. hueythehamster reblogged this from themathkid
  16. anispi reblogged this from themathkid
  17. corpusaristotelicum reblogged this from themathkid
  18. aliton reblogged this from themathkid
  19. suckmymath reblogged this from themathkid
  20. tswlft reblogged this from themathkid
  21. enigmacodebreaker reblogged this from themathkid
  22. desselleeanna reblogged this from themathkid and added:
    Googol. Yes.
  23. babybewilderbeast reblogged this from themathkid
  24. obeydonkey reblogged this from themathkid
  25. perfectly-ultimate-great-shoofle reblogged this from themathkid